
I was asking about your claim re: the head of Epic Games. I'm sure that they plan to turn a profit in 5 years or even more It all about getting gamers to buy games in EGS because the first time is always the hardest for any consumer So you see, Nobody is counting that buying Hades for EGS is going to return more money than they paid the devs(if they wanted that they would release it every where). U do know that some times companies/investors invest money for more than three years to get a kind of head start(which means that for this time it is losing money), example amazon is still losing money and been doing it for many years now, but since their sales are growing by 43% each year they think that in the end it will be worth it.(any good investment is usually long game) If EG made a console i wouldnt mind, because console is a service, for now they are worse than an expensive store The only way Steam could be a contender is only if gamers will act with thinking of the service the platform provides first and about the games later(or at least will be patient)ĭo you mean: the reason that Origin, despite having a variety of extremely popular games that are only available for purchase via its network, is still nowhere near as big as Steam years after launch? Despite the fact that Origin has a subscription service that allows users to access a variety of their most popular games for free? (Also: source on that claim re: net worth, please.) Irrelevant if they have to spend five times as much as a dev is likely to make on Steam just to attract attention, without even being able to secure a full exclusivity deal, they're totally ♥♥♥♥♥♥. So u really think they can't make a huge investment and just drown steam by buying games?

Also one of the owners of EG is Tencent, which is one of the biggest Chinise conglomerates. Originally posted by Google‡¤‡:The Head of Epic Games is more than 5 times richer than Gabe.
